Gas flaring and the depletion of the Ozone layer

This article first appeared in Energy, Oil & Gas on February 20, 2018

The planet has seen rapid warming in the past few decades. The consequences of global warming are largely due to increased greenhouse gas emissions – with CO2 proving to be significantly damaging to the atmosphere. Gas flaring – the process of burning off excess natural gas – releases CO2 into the atmosphere. If oil and gas companies are routinely flaring gas, how can they proactively reduce the effect on the Ozone layer? Are there techniques available to curb the impact of gas flaring?

The flaring climate

The flame at the top of an oil rig is an iconic image for the oil and gas industry. Flare stacks are used to burn off flammable gas released by pressure valves during unplanned over-pressuring of plant equipment, often taking place during start-ups and shutdowns in production when the volume of gas being extracted can be extremely uncertain. Flare stacks provide critical to on-site safety – the alternative to allowing the gas to escape would be a significant build-up of pressure and the risk of explosion.

However, gas is not always flared for safety reasons. When crude oil is extracted and produced from onshore or offshore oil wells, raw natural gas also comes to the surface. In areas of the world lacking pipelines and other gas transportation infrastructure, this gas is commonly, or routinely, flared.

Gas flaring may help to ensure on-site safety, but it is also responsible for the release of substances into the atmosphere that deplete the ozone layer and contribute to global warming. Based on satellite data it is estimated more than 150 billion cubic metres (or 5.3 trillion cubic feet) of natural gas is released into the atmosphere each year through natural gas flaring and venting (otherwise known as cold flaring).

Venting refers to the controlled release of gases into the atmosphere over the course of oil and gas production operations. These gases might be natural gas or other hydrocarbon vapours, water vapour, and other gases such as carbon dioxide, separated in the processing of oil or natural gas. Venting is an alternative to flaring if gases are not damaging to the environment.

Gas flaring has long been considered the lesser of two evils compared to venting. While burning gas leads to the release of CO2 into the atmosphere, it is significantly less harmful to the ozone layer than methane.

The pledge for a greener industry

It is in the interest of the entire industry not to routinely flare gas. If the industry could capture the substance at its source, it would significantly reduce the amount of environmental damage caused by flaring. Many countries have instigated taxation regimes against gas flaring and companies are now closely regulated.

The Zero Routine Flaring by 2030 Initiative was launched by the World Bank in 2015. It brought together governments, oil companies and development institutions that recognised flaring on the current scale was unsustainable and agreed to eliminate routine flaring no later than 2030.

The initiative has been endorsed by 57 organisations, including most of the major oil companies (BP, Eni, Repsol, Shell, Statoil, Total, as well as several national oil companies) and large oil-producing countries, including Angola, Canada, Mexico, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Russia and the US – under former President Obama.

Though the Zero Routine Flaring by 2030 Initiative is not a legally binding commitment, these governments and oil companies have agreed to report levels of flaring and progress towards the initiative’s goal to independent regulators.

To continue reading this article, click here.

July 6, 2018 | News

Related posts